InnoMemory, LLC v. Vantage Bank Texas
InnoMemory, LLC |
Vantage Bank Texas |
6:2022cv00860 |
August 18, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Alan D Albright |
Derek T Gilliland |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 NOTICE Unopposed Notice for Extension of Time for Defendant to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Original Complaint by InnoMemory, LLC (Ramey, William) |
Reset Deadlines: Vantage Bank Texas answer due 11/27/2022. (zv) |
![]() |
Parties shall comply with Judge Albright's updated #standing orders available by clicking the included hyperlinks. The updated orders are as follows:1. #Standing Order Governing Proceedings Patent Cases,2. #Amended Standing Order On Pretrial Procedures and Requirements in Civil Cases. (bot4) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by James E. Hudson, III on behalf of Vantage Bank Texas. Attorney James E. Hudson, III added to party Vantage Bank Texas(pty:dft) (Hudson, James) |
Filing 8 NOTICE Unopposed Notice for Extension of Time for Defendant to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Original Complaint by InnoMemory, LLC (Ramey, William) |
Reset Answer Deadlines: Vantage Bank Texas answer due 10/13/2022. (sv) |
![]() |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by InnoMemory, LLC. Vantage Bank Texas served on 8/23/2022, answer due 9/13/2022. (Ramey, William) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Vantage Bank Texas. (sv) |
All parties shall flatten all documents before e-filing. All parties shall comply with the Standing Orders located at https://www.txwd.uscourts.gov/judges-information/standing-orders/ |
Case randomly assigned to Judge Robert Pitman pursuant to the Order Assigning Business of the Court as it Relates to Patent Cases, filed 7/25/2022. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (sv) |
Filing 4 Certificate of Interested Parties by InnoMemory, LLC. (Ramey, William) |
Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by InnoMemory, LLC. (Ramey, William) |
Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 forwarded to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Ramey, William) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXWDC-16421933), filed by InnoMemory, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit US6240046, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit US7057960, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ramey, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: InnoMemory, LLC v. Vantage Bank Texas | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: InnoMemory, LLC | |
Represented By: | William P. Ramey, III |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Vantage Bank Texas | |
Represented By: | James E. Hudson, III |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.