Creekview IP LLC v. Matco Tools Corporation
| Creekview IP LLC |
| Matco Tools Corporation |
| 6:2022cv00904 |
| August 31, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Robert Pitman |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Report on Patent/Trademark sent to U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (bot2) |
Filing 12
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (lad)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER GRANTING #7 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Jimmy Chong for Creekview IP LLC. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Registration is managed by the PACER Service Center Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (lad)
|
| Filing 10 ATTACHMENT (Revised PHV) to #7 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Raymond W Mort, III for Jimmy Chong ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number ATXWDC-16608727) by Creekview IP LLC. (Mort, Raymond) |
| Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Matco Tools Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Vincent, Michael) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Creekview IP LLC (Mort, Raymond) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Raymond W Mort, III for Jimmy Chong ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number ATXWDC-16608727) by on behalf of Creekview IP LLC. (Mort, Raymond) |
| Filing 6 Pro Hac Vice Letter to Jimmy Chong. (lad) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Matco Tools Corporation. (lad) |
| Case assigned to Judge Robert Pitman. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (lad) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Creekview IP LLC. (Mort, Raymond) |
| Filing 3 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Creekview IP LLC. (Mort, Raymond) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 forwarded to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Mort, Raymond) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXWDC-16474376), filed by Creekview IP LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2)(Mort, Raymond) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Creekview IP LLC v. Matco Tools Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Creekview IP LLC | |
| Represented By: | Raymond W Mort, III |
| Represented By: | Jimmy Chong |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Matco Tools Corporation | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
