Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. et al v. U.S. Well Services, LLC
Plaintiff: Halliburton Energy Services, Inc., Halliburton US Technologies, Inc. and Halliburton Group Technologies, Inc.
Defendant: U.S. Well Services, LLC
Case Number: 6:2022cv00905
Filed: September 1, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Alan D Albright
Referring Judge: Derek T Gilliland
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 18, 2022 Filing 10 NOTICE of Extension of Time for Defendant to Respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint by U.S. Well Services, LLC (Cameron, Kyrie)
October 18, 2022 Reset Deadlines: U.S. Well Services, LLC answer due 11/7/2022. (lad)
October 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Derek T. Gilliland. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (bot4)
October 4, 2022 Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT against U.S. Well Services, LLC amending, filed by Halliburton Energy Services, Inc., Halliburton Group Technologies, Inc., Halliburton US Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit H (U.S. Patent 7,931,082))(Fulghum, Roger)
September 21, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE of Extension of Time for Defendant to Respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint by U.S. Well Services, LLC (Yates, John)
September 21, 2022 Reset Deadlines: U.S. Well Services, LLC answer due 10/24/2022. (lad)
September 16, 2022 Parties shall comply with Judge Albright's updated #standing orders available by clicking the included hyperlinks. The updated orders are as follows:1. #Standing Order Governing Proceedings Patent Cases,2. #Amended Standing Order On Pretrial Procedures and Requirements in Civil Cases. (bot4)
September 2, 2022 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to U.S. Well Services, LLC. (lad)
September 2, 2022 Filing 5 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 forwarded to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Fulghum, Roger)
September 1, 2022 Case assigned to Judge Alan D Albright. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (lad)
September 1, 2022 Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Halliburton Energy Services, Inc., Halliburton Group Technologies, Inc., Halliburton US Technologies, Inc.. (Fulghum, Roger)
September 1, 2022 Filing 3 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Halliburton Energy Services, Inc., Halliburton Group Technologies, Inc., Halliburton US Technologies, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Halliburton Holdings, LLC, Corporate Parent Halliburton Company for Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.; Corporate Parent Halliburton Group Technologies, Inc., Corporate Parent Halliburton Technology Holdings, Inc. for Halliburton US Technologies, Inc.; Corporate Parent Halliburton Holdings, LLC., Corporate Parent Halliburton Company for Halliburton Group Technologies, Inc.. (Fulghum, Roger)
September 1, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE of Related Cases by Halliburton Energy Services, Inc., Halliburton Group Technologies, Inc., Halliburton US Technologies, Inc. re #1 Complaint, (Fulghum, Roger)
September 1, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXWDC-16474418), filed by Halliburton Energy Services, Inc., Halliburton Group Technologies, Inc., Halliburton US Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Civil Cover Sheet)(Fulghum, Roger)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. et al v. U.S. Well Services, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.
Represented By: Roger J. Fulghum
Represented By: David Joshua Tobin
Represented By: Mark D. Siegmund
Represented By: Syed K. Fareed
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Halliburton US Technologies, Inc.
Represented By: Roger J. Fulghum
Represented By: Mark D. Siegmund
Represented By: David Joshua Tobin
Represented By: Syed K. Fareed
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Halliburton Group Technologies, Inc.
Represented By: Roger J. Fulghum
Represented By: Mark D. Siegmund
Represented By: Syed K. Fareed
Represented By: David Joshua Tobin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. Well Services, LLC
Represented By: John Allen Yates
Represented By: Kyrie Kimber Cameron
Represented By: Abelino Reyna
Represented By: Barden Todd Patterson
Represented By: Edgar Neil Gonzalez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?