Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. TKH Security B.V.
| Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. |
| TKH Security B.V. |
| 6:2022cv00963 |
| September 16, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Alan D Albright |
| Derek T Gilliland |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Report on Patent/Trademark sent to U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (bot1) |
| Filing 11 Report on Patent/Trademark sent to U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (bot1) |
Filing 10
ORDER GRANTING #9 Motion to Dismiss Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (lad)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss (Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice) by Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order). Motions referred to Judge Derek T. Gilliland. (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.. TKH Security B.V. served on 9/22/2022, answer due 10/13/2022. (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to TKH Security B.V.. (lad) |
| Parties shall comply with Judge Albright's standing orders at https://www.txwd.uscourts.gov/judges-information/standing-orders/.The following orders were updated on 9/16/22:1. Standing Order Governing Proceedings Patent Cases,2. Amended Standing Order On Pretrial Procedures and Requirements in Civil Cases.(lad) |
| Case assigned to Judge Alan D Albright and REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Derek T. Gilliland. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE (lad) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Related Case by Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
| Filing 5 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 forwarded to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.. (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
| Filing 3 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.. (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Isaac Rabicoff on behalf of Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXWDC-16535049), filed by Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(Rabicoff, Isaac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. TKH Security B.V. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Isaac Rabicoff |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: TKH Security B.V. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
