ALD Social, LLC v. AT&T, Inc.
| ALD Social, LLC |
| AT&T, Inc. and AT&T Mobility LLC |
| 6:2022cv00970 |
| September 16, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Fred Biery |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 Report on Patent/Trademark sent to U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (bot2) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by ALD Social, LLC (Ramey, William) |
| Filing 17 Certificate of Interested Parties by AT&T Mobility LLC. (Yungwirth, Matthew) |
| Filing 16 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by AT&T Mobility LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Yungwirth, Matthew) |
| Filing 15 SUMMONS Returned Executed by ALD Social, LLC. AT&T Mobility LLC served on 11/10/2022, answer due 12/1/2022. (Ramey, William) |
Filing 14
ORDER GRANTING #12 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Matthew S. Yungwirth for AT&T, Inc. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Registration is managed by the PACER Service Center. Signed by Judge Fred Biery. (zv)
|
| Filing 13 Summons Issued as to AT&T, Inc. (zv) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Gilbert Andrew Greene on behalf of Matthew S. Yungwirth ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number ATXWDC-16731390) by on behalf of AT&T, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Greene, Gilbert) |
| Filing 11 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by ALD Social, LLC. (Ramey, William) |
| Filing 10 AMENDED COMPLAINT Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint against AT&T, Inc. amending #1 , filed by ALD Social, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-D)(Ramey, William) Modified on 11/7/2022 to link to original complaint (zv). |
|
Filing 9
ORDER CONCERNING UNOPPOSED NOTICE EXTENDING TIME re #8 Notice (Other) filed by AT&T, Inc. Signed by Judge Fred Biery. (zv)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Unopposed Extension of Time to Answer Original Complaint for Patent Infringement by AT&T, Inc. re #1 Complaint (Greene, Gilbert) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Gilbert Andrew Greene on behalf of AT&T, Inc. (Greene, Gilbert) |
| Reset Answer Deadlines: AT&T, Inc. answer due 11/10/2022. (sv) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by ALD Social, LLC. AT&T, Inc. served on 9/20/2022, answer due 10/11/2022. (Ramey, William) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to AT&T, Inc. (zv) |
| Filing 4 Certificate of Interested Parties by ALD Social, LLC. (Ramey, William) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by ALD Social, LLC. (Ramey, William) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 forwarded to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Ramey, William) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXWDC-16534601), filed by ALD Social, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-D, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ramey, William) |
| Case directly assigned to Judge Fred Biery due to previously filed cases as having same Plaintiff and patent case numbers. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (zv) |
| All parties shall flatten all documents before e-filing. (zv) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
