Decapolis Systems, LLC v. Oracle Corporation
| Decapolis Systems, LLC |
| Oracle Corporation |
| 6:2022cv01003 |
| September 23, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Alan D Albright |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Report on Patent/Trademark sent to U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (bot2) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Decapolis Systems, LLC (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Garteiser, Randall) |
Filing 7
ORDER Vacating Referral to Magistrate Judge Derek T. Gilliland. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (lad)
|
|
Text Order GRANTING #6 Motion to Stay. Noting that the motion is agreed, the Court GRANTS the Motion. The case is hereby stayed until and including November 16, 2022. If the case is not dismissed by November 16, 2022, the parties must submit a status report to the Court. Entered by Judge Alan D Albright. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (EKlc)
|
| Filing 6 Agreed MOTION to Stay by Decapolis Systems, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order STAYING CASE UNTIL NOVEMBER 16, 2022). Motions referred to Judge Derek T. Gilliland. (Honea, Christopher) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Decapolis Systems, LLC. Oracle Corporation served on 10/21/2022, answer due 11/14/2022. (Garteiser, Randall) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Oracle Corporation. (sm3) |
| Case assigned to Judge Alan D Albright and Judge Derek T. Gilliland. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (sm3) |
| All parties shall flatten all documents before e-filing. All parties shall comply with the Standing Orders located at https://www.txwd.uscourts.gov/judges-information/standing-orders/ (sm3) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 forwarded to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Garteiser, Randall) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Decapolis Systems, LLC. (Garteiser, Randall) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXWDC-16562313), filed by Decapolis Systems, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Garteiser, Randall) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Decapolis Systems, LLC v. Oracle Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Decapolis Systems, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Randall T. Garteiser |
| Represented By: | M. Scott Fuller |
| Represented By: | Rene A. Vazquez |
| Represented By: | Christopher A. Honea |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Oracle Corporation | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
