ALD Social, LLC v. Verizon Communications, Inc.
| ALD Social, LLC |
| Verizon Communications, Inc. |
| 6:2022cv01011 |
| September 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Fred Biery |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER GRANTING #10 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #10 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint ; Verizon Communications, Inc. answer due 12/23/2022. Signed by Judge Fred Biery. (zv)
|
| Filing 11 Pro Hac Vice Letter to Verizon Communications, Inc. for attorney Kevin P. Anderson. (zv) |
| Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Verizon Communications, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Jones, Michael) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Holly Elin Engelmann on behalf of Verizon Communications, Inc.. Attorney Holly Elin Engelmann added to party Verizon Communications, Inc.(pty:dft) (Engelmann, Holly) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Shaun William Hassett on behalf of Verizon Communications, Inc.. Attorney Shaun William Hassett added to party Verizon Communications, Inc.(pty:dft) (Hassett, Shaun) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Michael E. Jones on behalf of Verizon Communications, Inc.. Attorney Michael E. Jones added to party Verizon Communications, Inc.(pty:dft) (Jones, Michael) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by ALD Social, LLC. Verizon Communications, Inc. served on 10/18/2022, answer due 11/8/2022. (Ramey, William) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Verizon Communications, Inc.. (sm3) |
| Case assigned to Judge Fred Biery. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (sm3) |
| Filing 4 Certificate of Interested Parties by ALD Social, LLC. (Ramey, William) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by ALD Social, LLC. (Ramey, William) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 forwarded to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Ramey, William) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXWDC-16577448), filed by ALD Social, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-D, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ramey, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: ALD Social, LLC v. Verizon Communications, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: ALD Social, LLC | |
| Represented By: | William P. Ramey, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Verizon Communications, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Michael E. Jones |
| Represented By: | Shaun William Hassett |
| Represented By: | Holly Elin Engelmann |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
