CTD Networks, LLC v. Google, LLC
CTD Networks, LLC |
Google, LLC |
6:2022cv01042 |
October 6, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Xavier Rodriguez |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Google, LLC. (Giese, Erica) |
Text Order GRANTING #14 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer entered by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. Defendant Google, LLC shall have up to and including December 30, 2022 to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (cb) |
Reset Deadlines: Google, LLC answer due 12/30/2022. (lad) |
Text Order GRANTING #10 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice entered by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted permission to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Registration is managed by the PACER Service Center. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (cb) |
Text Order GRANTING #9 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice entered by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Registration is managed by the PACER Service Center. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (cb) |
Text Order CONDITIONALLY GRANTING #11 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice entered by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. Because the attorney has appeared pro hac vice twice before, the attorney is admitted pro hac vice on the condition that she apply for admission to the Western District of Texas. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS the attorney to (1) apply for admission to practice before this Court within 90 days of this Order, (2) diligently pursue the application until such time as she may be admitted to practice in this district, and (3) familiarize herself with the Local Court Rules. The attorney shall advise the Court of her admission once admitted. Further, if not already done, the attorney must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Registration is managed by the PACER Service Center. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (cb) |
Text Order GRANTING #12 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice entered by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted permission to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Registration is managed by the PACER Service Center. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.)(cb) |
Text Order CONDITIONALLY GRANTING #13 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice entered by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. Because the attorney has appeared pro hac vice twice before, the attorney is admitted pro hac vice on the condition that he apply for admission to the Western District of Texas. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS the attorney to (1) apply for admission to practice before this Court within 90 days of this Order, (2) diligently pursue the application until such time as he may be admitted to practice in this district, and (3) familiarize himself with the Local Court Rules. The attorney shall advise the Court of his admission once admitted. Further, if not already done, the attorney must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Registration is managed by the PACER Service Center. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (cb) |
Filing 13 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Erica Benites Giese for Zachary M. Briers ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number ATXWDC-16698749) by on behalf of Google, LLC. (Giese, Erica) |
Filing 12 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Erica Benites Giese for Ted T. Kang ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number ATXWDC-16698731) by on behalf of Google, LLC. (Giese, Erica) |
Filing 11 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Erica Benites Giese for Heather E. Takahashi ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number ATXWDC-16698712) by on behalf of Google, LLC. (Giese, Erica) |
Filing 10 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Erica Benites Giese for Evan J. Mann ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number ATXWDC-16698692) by on behalf of Google, LLC. (Giese, Erica) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Erica Benites Giese for Adam W. Kwon ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number ATXWDC-16698637) by on behalf of Google, LLC. (Giese, Erica) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Erica Benites Giese on behalf of Google, LLC (Giese, Erica) |
Text Order GRANTING #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint entered by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. Defendant Google, LLC shall have up to and including December 12, 2022 to respond to Plaintiffs Complaint. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (XR) |
Reset Deadlines: Google, LLC answer due 12/12/2022. (lad) |
Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Google, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Giese, Erica) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by CTD Networks, LLC. Google, LLC served on 10/7/2022, answer due 10/28/2022. (Ramey, William) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Google, LLC. (lad) |
Filing 4 Certificate of Interested Parties by CTD Networks, LLC. (Ramey, William) |
Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by CTD Networks, LLC. (Ramey, William) |
Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 forwarded to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Ramey, William) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXWDC-16608942), filed by CTD Networks, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-H, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ramey, William) |
Case assigned to Judge Xavier Rodriguez. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (lad) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: CTD Networks, LLC v. Google, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: CTD Networks, LLC | |
Represented By: | William P. Ramey, III |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Google, LLC | |
Represented By: | Erica Benites Giese |
Represented By: | Amanda N. Crouch |
Represented By: | William Thomas Nilsson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.