Cloud Systems HoldCo IP, LLC v. Monitronics International Inc.
Cloud Systems HoldCo IP, LLC |
Monitronics International Inc. doing business as Brinks Home, and Livewatch Security, LLC |
6:2022cv01067 |
October 7, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Jason K Pulliam |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Reset Deadlines: Monitronics International Inc. answer due 1/3/2023. (lad) |
Text Order GRANTING #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer entered by Judge Jason K. Pulliam. The motion is granted as unopposed. Defendants deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is extended until January 3, 2023. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (dglc) |
Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Monitronics International Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Pankratz, Kurt) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Cloud Systems HoldCo IP, LLC. Monitronics International Inc. served on 10/12/2022, answer due 11/2/2022. (Ramey, William) |
Filing 6 STANDING ORDER for procedure in cases before Judge Pulliam. All parties and counsel are directed to review Judge Pulliam's Standing Order containing rules of practice, particularly the requirement of conference before filing a Motion to Dismiss under Federal Rule 12(b)(6) and demonstration of complete diversity. Failure to follow these rules of practice could result in the Court striking the Motion to Dismiss on its own initiative without further notice. Signed by Judge Jason Pulliam. |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Monitronics International Inc.. (sm3) |
Case assigned to Judge Jason K. Pulliam. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (sm3) |
Filing 4 Certificate of Interested Parties by Cloud Systems HoldCo IP, LLC. (Ramey, William) |
Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Cloud Systems HoldCo IP, LLC. (Ramey, William) |
Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 forwarded to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Ramey, William) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXWDC-16616734), filed by Cloud Systems HoldCo IP, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ramey, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Cloud Systems HoldCo IP, LLC v. Monitronics International Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Cloud Systems HoldCo IP, LLC | |
Represented By: | William P. Ramey, III |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Monitronics International Inc. doing business as Brinks Home, and Livewatch Security, LLC | |
Represented By: | Kurt Pankratz |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.