Grohoske v. Lopez
Petitioner: David Lester Grohoske
Respondent: TDCJ Director Bobby Lumpkin, Sheriff Joe Lopez and Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Case Number: 6:2022cv01131
Filed: October 27, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Alan D Albright
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 15, 2022 Filing 13 MOTION for Certificate of Appealability by David Lester Grohoske. (zv)
December 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Text Order DISMISSING #13 Motion for Certificate of Appealability. The Court has already denied Petitioner a certificate of appealability. Petitioner's motion is dismissed without prejudice to refiling in the Fifth Circuit. Entered by Judge Alan D Albright. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (tmj)
December 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Text Order DISMISSING #12 Motion for Certificate of Appealability. The Court has already denied Petitioner a certificate of appealability. Petitioner's motion is dismissed without prejudice to refiling in the Fifth Circuit. Petitioner's motion has also been construed as a notice of appeal. Entered by Judge Alan D Albright. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (tmj)
December 7, 2022 NOTICE OF APPEAL by David Lester Grohoske. Per 5th Circuit rules, the appellant has 14 days, from the filing of the Notice of Appeal, to order the transcript. To order a transcript, the appellant should fill out a #(Transcript Order) and follow the instructions set out on the form. This form is available in the Clerk's Office or by clicking the hyperlink above. (zv)
December 7, 2022 Filing 12 Motion Certificate of Appealability filed. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Appealability Pages 4-5) (zv)
November 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 JUDGMENT. It is therefore ORDERED that David Lester Grohoskes Petition for Habeas Corpus Relief is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to exhaust state court remedies. It is finally ORDERED that the above styled and numbered cause is CLOSED. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (zv)
November 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Certificate of Appealability is Denied. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (zv)
November 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Text Order GRANTING #7 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis entered by Judge Alan D Albright. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (sf1)
November 16, 2022 Filing 9 SUPPLEMENT to #6 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by David Lester Grohoske. (zv)
November 16, 2022 Filing 8 SUPPLEMENT to #6 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by David Lester Grohoske. (zv)
November 16, 2022 Filing 7 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by David Lester Grohoske. (zv)
November 16, 2022 Filing 6 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus re #4 DEFICIENCY ORDER, filed by David Lester Grohoske.(zv)
November 16, 2022 Filing 5 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by David Lester Grohoske.(lad)
November 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 DEFICIENCY ORDER. On or before December 2, 2022, submit either the filing fee of $5.00 or a completed and properly supported application to proceed in forma pauperis. Petitioner must fill out this form with all the claims he believes he has and return it to the Court on or before December 2,2022. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (Attachments: #1 2254 Blank Form, #2 IFP)(bw)
October 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER OF CONSOLIDATION. Cause No. W-22-CV-1131-ADA is hereby CONSOLIDATED with Cause No. W-22-CV-1133-ADA, with all pleadings to be filed from this date forward in the lead case of Cause No. W-22-CV-1131-ADA. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (lad)
October 27, 2022 Filing 2 Case Opening Letter to David Lester Grohoske. (zv)
October 27, 2022 Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by David Lester Grohoske. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(zv)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Grohoske v. Lopez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: David Lester Grohoske
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: TDCJ Director Bobby Lumpkin
Represented By: Edward L. Marshall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Sheriff Joe Lopez
Represented By: Edward L. Marshall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?