Datanet LLC v. Dropbox Inc.
Plaintiff: Datanet LLC
Defendant: Dropbox Inc.
Case Number: 6:2022cv01142
Filed: October 31, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Orlando L Garcia
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Text Order GRANTING #12 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Sharif Ahmed for Datanet LLC. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Registration is managed by the PACER Service Center entered by Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ju)
December 16, 2022 Filing 12 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Alden G. Harris for Sharif Ahmed ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number ATXWDC-16872118) by on behalf of Datanet LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Harris, Alden)
December 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Text Order GRANTING #11 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is extended to January 19, 2023 entered by Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ju)
December 5, 2022 Filing 11 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Datanet LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Harris, Alden)
November 21, 2022 Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Datanet LLC. Dropbox Inc. served on 11/14/2022, answer due 12/5/2022. (Harris, Alden)
November 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Text Order GRANTING #6 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Gregory P. Sitrick for Datanet LLC. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Registration is managed by the PACER Service Center entered by Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ju)
November 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Text Order GRANTING #7 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Isaac S. Crum for Datanet LLC. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Registration is managed by the PACER Service Center entered by Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ju)
November 4, 2022 Filing 9 Summons Issued as to Dropbox Inc.. (lad)
November 4, 2022 Filing 8 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Datanet LLC. (Harris, Alden)
November 4, 2022 Filing 7 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Alden G. Harris for Isaac Crum ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number ATXWDC-16721050) by on behalf of Datanet LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Harris, Alden)
November 4, 2022 Filing 6 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Alden G. Harris for Gregory Sitrick ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number ATXWDC-16721015) by on behalf of Datanet LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Harris, Alden)
November 1, 2022 Filing 5 Pro Hac Vice Letter to Datanet LLC for attorney Isaac S. Crum. (zv)
November 1, 2022 Filing 4 Pro Hac Vice Letter to Datanet LLC for attorney Gregory P. Sitrick. (zv)
October 31, 2022 All parties shall flatten all documents before e-filing. (zv)
October 31, 2022 Case randomly assigned to Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia pursuant to the Order Assigning Business of the Court as it Relates to Patent Cases, filed 7/25/2022. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (zv)
October 31, 2022 Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Parties by Datanet LLC. (Harris, Alden)
October 31, 2022 Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 forwarded to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Harris, Alden)
October 31, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXWDC-16698537). No Summons requested at this time, filed by Datanet LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C)(Harris, Alden)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Datanet LLC v. Dropbox Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Datanet LLC
Represented By: Alden G. Harris
Represented By: Gregory P. Sitrick
Represented By: Isaac S. Crum
Represented By: Sharif Ahmed
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dropbox Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?