ParkerVision, Inc. v. MediaTek Inc. et al
| ParkerVision, Inc. |
| MediaTek Inc. and MediaTek USA Inc. |
| 6:2022cv01163 |
| November 10, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Alan D Albright |
| Derek T Gilliland |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to MediaTek Inc., MediaTek USA Inc.. (lad) |
| Filing 5 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by ParkerVision, Inc.. (Mort, Raymond) |
| Filing 4 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by ParkerVision, Inc.. (Mort, Raymond) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 forwarded to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Mort, Raymond) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Related Cases by ParkerVision, Inc. re #1 Complaint (Mort, Raymond) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXWDC-16742040), filed by ParkerVision, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Mort, Raymond) |
| Case assigned to Judge Alan D Albright due to related cases and REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Derek T. Gilliland. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE (lad) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
