Wiesblatt Licensing LLC v. Acer America Corporation
| Wiesblatt Licensing LLC |
| Acer America Corporation |
| 6:2022cv01217 |
| November 23, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Fred Biery |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER GRANTING #10 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Jerry Chen for Acer America Corporation. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Registration is managed by the PACER Service Center Signed by Judge Fred Biery. (sm3)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER GRANTING #9 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Kaiwen Tseng for Acer America Corporation. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Registration is managed by the PACER Service Center Signed by Judge Fred Biery. (sm3)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER GRANTING #8 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Craig Kaufman for Acer America Corporation. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Registration is managed by the PACER Service Center Signed by Judge Fred Biery. (sm3)
|
| Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Eric H. Findlay for Jerry Chen ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number ATXWDC-16908357) by on behalf of Acer America Corporation. (Findlay, Eric) |
| Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Eric H. Findlay for Kaiwen Tseng ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number ATXWDC-16908353) by on behalf of Acer America Corporation. (Findlay, Eric) |
| Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Eric H. Findlay for Craig Kaufman ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number ATXWDC-16908349) by on behalf of Acer America Corporation. (Findlay, Eric) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER GRANTING #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #5 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint ; Acer America Corporation answer due 2/13/2023. Signed by Judge Fred Biery. (ad3)
|
| Filing 6 Pro Hac Vice Letter for Craig Kaufman, Kaiwen Tseng, Jerry Chen. (ad3) |
| Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Acer America Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Findlay, Eric) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Acer America Corporation. (lad) |
| Case assigned to Judge Fred Biery due to related case. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (lad) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Wiesblatt Licensing LLC. (Honea, Christopher) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 forwarded to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Honea, Christopher) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXWDC-16786920), filed by Wiesblatt Licensing LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Honea, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
