Recog IP LLC v. The Gap, Inc.
| Recog IP LLC |
| The Gap, Inc. |
| 6:2022cv01261 |
| December 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Alan D Albright |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER GRANTING #8 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Brian E. Ferguson. Attorney added for The Gap, Inc. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order, if he/she has not previously done so for a prior case in this District. Registration is managed by the PACER Service Center. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (bot2)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Barry K. Shelton for Brian E. Ferguson ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number ATXWDC-16899367) by on behalf of The Gap, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Shelton, Barry) |
| Reset Deadlines: The Gap, Inc. answer due 2/13/2023. (zv) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Agreed Extension of Time to File Answer by The Gap, Inc. re #1 Complaint (Shelton, Barry) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Barry K. Shelton on behalf of The Gap, Inc.. Attorney Barry K. Shelton added to party The Gap, Inc.(pty:dft) (Shelton, Barry) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to The Gap, Inc. (zv) |
| Filing 4 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by RECOG IP LLC. (Bennett, David) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by RECOG IP LLC. (Bennett, David) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 forwarded to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Bennett, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXWDC-16829271), filed by RECOG IP LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - U.S. Patent No. 7,296,062, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Bennett, David) |
| Case directly assigned to Judge Alan D Albright due to previously filed case(s) as having same Plaintiff and patent case numbers. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (zv) |
| Please remember to comply with the standing orders located at https://www.txwd.uscourts.gov/judges-information/standing-orders/. (zv) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Recog IP LLC v. The Gap, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Recog IP LLC | |
| Represented By: | David R. Bennett |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The Gap, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Brian E. Ferguson |
| Represented By: | Barry K. Shelton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
