Front Row Technologies, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
| Front Row Technologies, LLC |
| Cisco Systems, Inc. |
| 6:2023cv00035 |
| January 20, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Alia Moses |
| Patent |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 Patent Infringement |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 Agreed MOTION to Stay by Front Row Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Ramey, William) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Krishnan Padmanabhan on behalf of Cisco Systems, Inc.. Attorney Krishnan Padmanabhan added to party Cisco Systems, Inc.(pty:dft) (Padmanabhan, Krishnan) |
| Filing 18 DEFICIENCY NOTICE: re #17 Stipulation (lad) |
| Filing 17 STIPULATION Joint Stipulation of Stay by Front Row Technologies, LLC. (Ramey, William) |
| Filing 16 REPLY to Response to Motion, filed by Cisco Systems, Inc., re #13 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings for Lack of Patent Eligibility Under U.S.C. 101 filed by Defendant Cisco Systems, Inc. (Shelton, Barry) |
| Filing 15 RESPONSE to Motion, filed by Front Row Technologies, LLC, re #13 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings for Lack of Patent Eligibility Under U.S.C. 101 filed by Defendant Cisco Systems, Inc. (Ramey, William) |
Text Order GRANTING #14 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #14 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #13 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings for Lack of Patent Eligibility Under U.S.C. 101 entered by Chief Judge Alia Moses. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (JMlc)
|
| Filing 14 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #13 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings for Lack of Patent Eligibility Under U.S.C. 101 by Front Row Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Ramey, William) |
| Filing 13 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings for Lack of Patent Eligibility Under U.S.C. 101 by Cisco Systems, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Shelton, Barry) |
| Filing 12 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Cisco Systems, Inc.. (Shelton, Barry) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Cisco Systems, Inc..(Shelton, Barry) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Barry K. Shelton for Ryan David Bradley ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number ATXWDC-17044185) by on behalf of Cisco Systems, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Shelton, Barry) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Barry K. Shelton for Krishnan Padmanabhan ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number ATXWDC-17044160) by on behalf of Cisco Systems, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Shelton, Barry) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Barry K. Shelton for Christopher T. Gresalfi ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number ATXWDC-17044099) by on behalf of Cisco Systems, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Shelton, Barry) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Barry K. Shelton on behalf of Cisco Systems, Inc.. Attorney Barry K. Shelton added to party Cisco Systems, Inc.(pty:dft) (Shelton, Barry) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Front Row Technologies, LLC. Cisco Systems, Inc. served on 1/24/2023, answer due 2/14/2023. (Ramey, William) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Cisco Systems, Inc. (zv) |
| Case randomly assigned to Chief Judge Alia Moses pursuant to the Order Assigning Business of the Court as it Relates to Patent Cases, filed 7/25/2022. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (zv) |
| Please remember to comply with the standing orders located at https://www.txwd.uscourts.gov/judges-information/standing-orders/. (zv) |
| Filing 4 Certificate of Interested Parties by Front Row Technologies, LLC. (Ramey, William) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Front Row Technologies, LLC. (Ramey, William) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 forwarded to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Ramey, William) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXWDC-16982268), filed by Front Row Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ramey, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Front Row Technologies, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Front Row Technologies, LLC | |
| Represented By: | William P. Ramey, III |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey Eugene Kubiak |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Cisco Systems, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Barry K. Shelton |
| Represented By: | Krishnan Padmanabhan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
