AuthWallet, LLC v. CIBC Bank USA
| AuthWallet, LLC |
| CIBC Bank USA |
| 6:2023cv00141 |
| February 22, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| David A Ezra |
| Robert Pitman |
| Patent |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
TRANSFER ORDER. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (ad3)
|
| Reset Deadlines: CIBC Bank USA answer due 5/30/2023. (ad3) |
|
Text Order GRANTING #9 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer entered by Judge Robert Pitman. IT IS ORDERED that Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to the complaint on or before May 30, 2023. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (sh)
|
| Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by AuthWallet, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Ramey, William) |
|
Text Order GRANTING #8 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer entered by Judge Robert Pitman. IT IS ORDERED that Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to the complaint on or before April 30, 2023. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (sh)
|
| Reset Deadlines: CIBC Bank USA answer due 4/30/2023. (zv) |
| Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by AuthWallet, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Ramey, William) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by AuthWallet, LLC. CIBC Bank USA served on 2/23/2023, answer due 3/16/2023. (Ramey, William) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to CIBC Bank USA. (ad3) |
| Case assigned to Judge Robert Pitman. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (ad3) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE Notice of Related Cases by AuthWallet, LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Ramey, William) |
| Filing 4 Certificate of Interested Parties by AuthWallet, LLC. (Ramey, William) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by AuthWallet, LLC. (Ramey, William) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 forwarded to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Ramey, William) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXWDC-17112327), filed by AuthWallet, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ramey, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: AuthWallet, LLC v. CIBC Bank USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: AuthWallet, LLC | |
| Represented By: | William P. Ramey, III |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey Eugene Kubiak |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: CIBC Bank USA | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
