AuthWallet, LLC v. First Citizens Bank
| AuthWallet, LLC |
| First Citizens Bank |
| 6:2023cv00144 |
| February 22, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| David A Ezra |
| Robert Pitman |
| Patent |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge David A. Ezra for all proceedings. Judge Robert Pitman no longer assigned to case. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (lad)
|
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by AuthWallet, LLC. First Citizens Bank served on 2/24/2023, answer due 5/1/2023. (Ramey, William) |
| Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by First Citizens Bank. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Ciccarelli, Massimo) |
|
Text Order GRANTING #9 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer entered by Judge Robert Pitman. In light of the lack of opposition and for good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant First Citizens Bank shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint on or before May 1, 2023. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (lolc)
|
| Reset Deadlines: First Citizens Bank answer due 5/1/2023. (lad) |
| Filing 8 DEFICIENCY NOTICE: re #7 Notice (Other) (lad) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE UNOPPOSED NOTICE REGARDING EXTENSION OF DEADLINE FOR FIRST CITIZENS BANK TO ANSWER THE COMPLAINT BY 45 DAYS by First Citizens Bank (Ciccarelli, Massimo) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to First Citizens Bank. (lad) |
| Case assigned to Judge Robert Pitman. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (lad) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE Notice of Related Cases by AuthWallet, LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Ramey, William) |
| Filing 4 Certificate of Interested Parties by AuthWallet, LLC. (Ramey, William) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by AuthWallet, LLC. (Ramey, William) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 forwarded to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Ramey, William) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXWDC-17113060), filed by AuthWallet, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ramey, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: AuthWallet, LLC v. First Citizens Bank | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: AuthWallet, LLC | |
| Represented By: | William P. Ramey, III |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey Eugene Kubiak |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: First Citizens Bank | |
| Represented By: | Massimo Ciccarelli |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
