Redwood Technologies, LLC v. Acer Inc. et al
| Redwood Technologies, LLC |
| Acer Inc. and Acer America Corporation |
| 6:2023cv00280 |
| April 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Alan D Albright |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Parties shall comply with Judge Albright's updated Standing Orders: #Order Regarding Court Docket Management and #Amended Standing Order for Pretrial Procedure. Both orders are available by clicking the hyperlink. (bot2) |
| Reset Deadlines: Acer America Corporation and Acer Inc. answer due 6/22/2023. (zv) |
| Please be advised that Stipulation #15 is fine, but no need of a proposed order for the Court to grant per RJlc. Thank you. (zv) |
| Filing 15 STIPULATION Joint Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to the Complaint by Acer America Corporation, Acer Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Findlay, Eric) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jonathan H. Rastegar on behalf of Redwood Technologies, LLC (Rastegar, Jonathan) |
| Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Redwood Technologies, LLC. Acer Inc. served on 4/18/2023, answer due 5/9/2023. (Conroy, Patrick) |
| Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Redwood Technologies, LLC. Acer America Corporation served on 4/17/2023, answer due 5/8/2023. (Conroy, Patrick) |
| Filing 11 Summons Issued as to Acer Inc. (zv) |
| Filing 10 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Redwood Technologies, LLC. (Conroy, Patrick) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance (corrected) by John Paul Murphy on behalf of Redwood Technologies, LLC (Murphy, John) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance (corrected) by T. William Kennedy, Jr on behalf of Redwood Technologies, LLC (Kennedy, T.) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by T. William Kennedy, Jr on behalf of Redwood Technologies, LLC (Kennedy, T.) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by John Paul Murphy on behalf of Redwood Technologies, LLC (Murphy, John) |
| Filing 5 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Redwood Technologies, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Dominion Harbor Enterprises, LLC, Corporate Parent Monument IP Fund 2, LLC for Redwood Technologies, LLC. (Conroy, Patrick) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Acer America Corporation. (lad) |
| All parties please flatten all fillable pdf's before e-filing. Please remember to comply with the standing orders located at https://www.txwd.uscourts.gov/judges-information/standing-orders/. (zv) |
| Case assigned to Judge Alan D Albright. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (lad) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Redwood Technologies, LLC. (Conroy, Patrick) (Main Document 3 replaced on 4/17/2023) (zv). Modified on 4/17/2023 due to not being flatten (zv). |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 forwarded to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Conroy, Patrick) (Main Document 2 replaced on 4/17/2023) (zv). Modified on 4/17/2023 due to not being flatten (zv). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXWDC-17316708), filed by Redwood Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Conroy, Patrick) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
