Poniatowski v. Apple, Inc.
| Paul Poniatowski |
| Apple, Inc. |
| 6:2023cv00316 |
| May 2, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Orlando L Garcia |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Text Order GRANTING #5 Motion for Permission to File Electronically. Plaintiff is directed to contact the Clerk's Office to obtain the e-filing and e-noticing registration form, or to obtain the form from the Court's website, and to submit the fully completed form to the Clerk. The registration form will be processed by the Clerk, who has the responsibility of verifying, approving, and effectuating the e-filing and e-noticing of Court documents. Entered by Judge Richard B. Farrer. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (MClc)
|
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Paul Poniatowski. Apple, Inc. served on 5/31/2023, answer due 6/21/2023. (sm3) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Apple, Inc.. (sm3) |
|
Text Order REFERRING #5 Pro Se Motion for Permission to file Electronically to United States Magistrate Judge Richard B. Farrer entered by Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (pt)
|
| Filing 5 Pro Se MOTION for Permission to file Electronically by Paul Poniatowski. (lad) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER DENYING #3 Pro Se Motion for Permission to file Electronically. Signed by Judge Richard B. Farrer. (Attachments: #1 Permission to File Electronically form) (lad)
|
|
ORDER REFERRING MOTION: #3 Pro Se MOTION for Permission to file Electronically filed by Paul Poniatowski. Signed by Judge Orlando L. Garcia.. Referral Magistrate Judge: Richard B. Farrer. (ad3)
|
|
Text Order REFERRING #3 Pro Se Motion for Permission to file Electronically to United States Magistrate Judge Richard B. Farrer for consideration and hearing if necessary entered by Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (pt)
|
| Filing 3 Pro Se MOTION for Permission to file Electronically by Paul Poniatowski. (bw) |
| Filing 2 Report on Patent/Trademark sent to U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (bw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 76406112304)filed by Paul Poniatowski. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Filing Fee Receipt)(bw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Poniatowski v. Apple, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Paul Poniatowski | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Apple, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
