Patent Armory Inc. v. LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc.
Patent Armory Inc. |
LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. |
6:2023cv00326 |
May 5, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Alan D Albright |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 forwarded to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT against LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. amending #1 Complaint,., filed by Patent Armory Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6)(Rabicoff, Isaac) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Patent Armory Inc.. LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. served on 5/11/2023, answer due 6/1/2023. (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Agreed Extension of Time for Plaintiff LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. to Answer, Move or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint to 7/17/23 by Patent Armory Inc. re #1 Complaint, (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
DEFICIENCY NOTICE: re #7 Notice (Other) Without a Summons Returned Executed filed in this case, we do not have a due date for the answer and therefore cannot reset the answer due date as noticed. Please file a Motion for the extension. (lad) |
Reset Deadlines: LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. answer due 7/17/2023. (lad) |
Parties shall comply with Judge Albright's updated Standing Orders: #Order Regarding Court Docket Management and #Amended Standing Order for Pretrial Procedure. Both orders are available by clicking the hyperlink. (bot2) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc.. (lad) |
Case assigned to Judge Alan D Albright. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (lad) |
Filing 5 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 forwarded to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Patent Armory Inc.. (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
Filing 3 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Patent Armory Inc.. (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Isaac Rabicoff on behalf of Patent Armory Inc. (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXWDC-17404794), filed by Patent Armory Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Rabicoff, Isaac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Patent Armory Inc. v. LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Patent Armory Inc. | |
Represented By: | Isaac Rabicoff |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.