ParkerVision, Inc. v. NXP Semiconductors N.V. et al
Plaintiff: ParkerVision, Inc.
Defendant: NXP Semiconductors N.V., NXP B.V. and NXP USA, Inc. d/b/a NXP Semiconductors USA, Inc.
Case Number: 6:2023cv00389
Filed: May 19, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Alan D Albright
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 6, 2023 Filing 20 NOTICE Regarding Extension of Time for Defendants to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Original Complaint by NXP B.V., NXP Semiconductors N.V. (Chibib, Michael)
July 6, 2023 Reset Deadlines: NXP B.V. and NXP Semiconductors N.V. answer due 8/25/2023. (zv)
June 1, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER GRANTING #10 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Ronald M. Daignault for ParkerVision, Inc. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Registration is managed by the PACER Service Center. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (zv)
June 1, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER GRANTING #12 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Scott R. Samay for ParkerVision, Inc. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Registration is managed by the PACER Service Center. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (zv)
June 1, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER GRANTING #11 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Stephanie R. Mandir. Attorney added for ParkerVision, Inc. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order, if he/she has not previously done so for a prior case in this District. Registration is managed by the PACER Service Center. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (bot1)
June 1, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER GRANTING #9 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Jason S. Charkow. Attorney added for ParkerVision, Inc. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order, if he/she has not previously done so for a prior case in this District. Registration is managed by the PACER Service Center. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (bot1)
June 1, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER GRANTING #8 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Chandran B. Iyer. Attorney added for ParkerVision, Inc. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order, if he/she has not previously done so for a prior case in this District. Registration is managed by the PACER Service Center. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (bot1)
May 31, 2023 Filing 14 ATTACHMENT to #12 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Raymond W Mort, III for Scott R. Samay ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number ATXWDC-17500698) by ParkerVision, Inc.. (Mort, Raymond)
May 31, 2023 Filing 13 ATTACHMENT to #8 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Raymond W Mort, III for Chandran B. Iyer ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number ATXWDC-17500634) by ParkerVision, Inc.. (Mort, Raymond)
May 31, 2023 Filing 12 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Raymond W Mort, III for Scott R. Samay ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number ATXWDC-17500698) by on behalf of ParkerVision, Inc.. (Mort, Raymond)
May 31, 2023 Filing 11 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Raymond W Mort, III for Stephanie R. Mandir ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number ATXWDC-17500682) by on behalf of ParkerVision, Inc.. (Mort, Raymond)
May 31, 2023 Filing 10 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Raymond W Mort, III for Ronald M. Daignault ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number ATXWDC-17500664) by on behalf of ParkerVision, Inc.. (Mort, Raymond)
May 31, 2023 Filing 9 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Raymond W Mort, III for Jason S. Charkow ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number ATXWDC-17500646) by on behalf of ParkerVision, Inc.. (Mort, Raymond)
May 31, 2023 Filing 8 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Raymond W Mort, III for Chandran B. Iyer ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number ATXWDC-17500634) by on behalf of ParkerVision, Inc.. (Mort, Raymond)
May 23, 2023 Parties shall comply with Judge Albright's updated Standing Orders: #Order Regarding Court Docket Management and #Amended Standing Order for Pretrial Procedure. Both orders are available by clicking the hyperlink. (bot2)
May 22, 2023 Filing 7 Pro Hac Vice Letter as to Charkow. (Attachments: #1 Daignault, #2 Iyer, #3 Mandir, #4 Samay)(ad3)
May 22, 2023 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (ad3)
May 19, 2023 Case assigned to Judge Alan D Albright. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (ad3)
May 19, 2023 Filing 5 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by ParkerVision, Inc.. (Mort, Raymond)
May 19, 2023 Filing 4 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by ParkerVision, Inc.. (Mort, Raymond)
May 19, 2023 Filing 3 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 forwarded to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Mort, Raymond)
May 19, 2023 Filing 2 NOTICE of Related Cases by ParkerVision, Inc. re #1 Complaint (Mort, Raymond)
May 19, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXWDC-17461709), filed by ParkerVision, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Mort, Raymond)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ParkerVision, Inc. v. NXP Semiconductors N.V. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ParkerVision, Inc.
Represented By: Raymond W Mort, III
Represented By: Ronald M. Daignault
Represented By: Scott R. Samay
Represented By: Zachary H. Ellis
Represented By: Chandran B. Iyer
Represented By: Jason S. Charkow
Represented By: Stephanie R. Mandir
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NXP Semiconductors N.V.
Represented By: Michael Chibib
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NXP B.V.
Represented By: Michael Chibib
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NXP USA, Inc. d/b/a NXP Semiconductors USA, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?