Wildcat Licensing LLC v. Parrot Drones SAS et al
Wildcat Licensing LLC |
Parrot Drones SAS and Parrot S.A. |
6:2023cv00449 |
June 13, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Fred Biery |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Wildcat Licensing LLC as to Parrot Drones SAS. Waiver sent on 8/6/2023, answer due 11/6/2023. (DiNovo, Andrew) |
Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Wildcat Licensing LLC as to Parrot S.A.. Waiver sent on 8/6/2023, answer due 11/6/2023. (DiNovo, Andrew) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Christopher V. Goodpastor on behalf of Wildcat Licensing LLC (Goodpastor, Christopher) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Parrot Drones SAS & Parrot S.A.. (ad3) |
Case assigned to Judge Fred Biery. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (ad3) |
Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Wildcat Licensing LLC. (DiNovo, Andrew) |
Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 forwarded to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (DiNovo, Andrew) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXWDC-17549543), filed by Wildcat Licensing LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(DiNovo, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.