FrameTech LLC v. BMC Software, Inc.
| FrameTech LLC |
| BMC Software, Inc. |
| 6:2023cv00494 |
| July 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| David Counts |
| Derek T Gilliland |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Reset Deadlines: BMC Software, Inc. answer due 9/25/2023. (lad) |
Text Order GRANTING #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer entered by Judge Derek T. Gilliland. It is therefore ORDERED that defendant BMC Software Inc.'s deadline to respond to the Complaint shall be extended by 45 days, up to and including September 25, 2023. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (mslc)
|
| Filing 9 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by BMC Software, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent BMC Holding I LLC, Corporate Parent KKR & Co. Inc. for BMC Software, Inc.. (Logan, William) |
| Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by BMC Software, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order). Motions referred to Judge Derek T. Gilliland. (Logan, William) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER AND ADVISORY. Case has been referred to Magistrate Judge Derek T. Gilliland. Signed by Judge David Counts. (bw)
|
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to BMC Software, Inc. (zv) |
| Case assigned to Judge David Counts. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (zv) |
| Please remember to comply with the standing orders located at https://www.txwd.uscourts.gov/judges-information/standing-orders/. (zv) |
| Filing 5 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 forwarded to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by FrameTech LLC. (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
| Filing 3 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by FrameTech LLC. (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Isaac Rabicoff on behalf of FrameTech LLC (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXWDC-17653999), filed by FrameTech LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Rabicoff, Isaac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: FrameTech LLC v. BMC Software, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: FrameTech LLC | |
| Represented By: | Isaac Rabicoff |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: BMC Software, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | William M. Logan |
| Represented By: | E. Danielle T. Williams |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
