Patent Armory Inc. v. Enterprise Holdings, Inc.
| Patent Armory Inc. |
| Enterprise Holdings, Inc. |
| 6:2023cv00582 |
| August 11, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Alan D Albright |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Reset Deadlines: Enterprise Holdings, Inc. answer due 10/25/2023. (lad) |
Text Order GRANTING 23 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer entered by Judge Alan D Albright. Came on for consideration is Defendant's Motion. Noting that it is unopposed, the Court GRANTS the Motion. Defendant shall have up to and including October 25, 2023 to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jslc)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION of Agreed Extension of Time for Defendant Enterprise Holdings, Inc. to Answer, Move, or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint to 10/25/2023 (48 days total) by Patent Armory Inc. re #1 Complaint, (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Agreed Extension of Time for Defendant Enterprise Holdings, Inc. to Answer, Move, or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint to 10/10/2023 by Patent Armory Inc. re #1 Complaint, (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
| Reset Deadlines: Enterprise Holdings, Inc. answer due 10/10/2023. (ad3) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Enterprise Holdings, Inc.. (ad3) |
| Case assigned to Judge Alan D Albright. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (ad3) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Related Case by Patent Armory Inc. (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
| Filing 5 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 forwarded to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Patent Armory Inc.. (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
| Filing 3 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Patent Armory Inc.. (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Isaac Rabicoff on behalf of Patent Armory Inc. (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXWDC-17762164), filed by Patent Armory Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Civil Cover Sheet)(Rabicoff, Isaac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Patent Armory Inc. v. Enterprise Holdings, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Patent Armory Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Isaac Rabicoff |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Enterprise Holdings, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
