ScanComm LLC v. Microsoft Corporation
ScanComm LLC |
Microsoft Corporation |
6:2023cv00634 |
August 28, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Xavier Rodriguez |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Report on Patent/Trademark sent to U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (bot1) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by ScanComm LLC (Alexander, Cortney) |
Text Order GRANTING #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer entered by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. The deadline for Defendant to move, answer, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is hereby extended to December 6, 2023. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (cb) |
Reset Deadlines: Microsoft Corporation answer due 12/6/2023. (ad3) |
Filing 7 Agreed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by ScanComm LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Alexander, Cortney) |
Reset Deadlines: Microsoft Corporation answer due 11/6/2023. (lad) |
Text Order GRANTING #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer entered by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. The deadline for Defendant to move, answer, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is hereby extended to November 6, 2023. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (cb) |
Filing 6 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by ScanComm LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Alexander, Cortney) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Microsoft Corporation. (zv) |
Case assigned to Judge Xavier Rodriguez. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (zv) |
Please remember to comply with the standing orders located at https://www.txwd.uscourts.gov/judges-information/standing-orders/. (zv) |
Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by ScanComm LLC. (Alexander, Cortney) |
Filing 3 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by ScanComm LLC. (Alexander, Cortney) |
Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 forwarded to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Alexander, Cortney) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXWDC-17817569), filed by ScanComm LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - US Patent No. 11,003,878, #2 Exhibit B - Claim Chart for the '878 Patent re Skype, #3 Exhibit C - Claim Chart for the '878 Patent re LinkedIn, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Alexander, Cortney) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: ScanComm LLC v. Microsoft Corporation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: ScanComm LLC | |
Represented By: | Cortney Alexander |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Microsoft Corporation | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.