Best v. United States of America
| Richard Best and Richard Douglas Best |
| United States of America (Acting Through The United States Postal Service) and United States of America |
| 6:2023cv00728 |
| October 25, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Alan D Albright |
| Jeffrey C Manske |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit). Motions referred to Judge Jeffrey C. Manske. (Vereen, Darryl) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to United States of America. (zv) |
| Case assigned to Judge Alan D Albright and CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Jeffrey C. Manske. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (zv) |
| Please remember to comply with the standing orders located at https://www.txwd.uscourts.gov/judges-information/standing-orders/. (zv) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Richard Best. (Ainsworth, Price) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXWDC-18026875), filed by Richard Best. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ainsworth, Price) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
