Sensor360 LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
Sensor360 LLC |
Cisco Systems, Inc. |
6:2023cv00806 |
November 24, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
David A Ezra |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT against Cisco Systems, Inc. amending #1 Complaint., filed by Sensor360 LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Rabicoff, Isaac) |
Filing 12 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #11 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings For Lack of Patent Eligibility Under 35 U.S.C. Section 101 by Sensor360 LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Rabicoff, Isaac) |
Filing 11 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings For Lack of Patent Eligibility Under 35 U.S.C. Section 101 by Cisco Systems, Inc.. (Padmanabhan, Krishnan) |
Filing 10 Certificate of Interested Parties and Corporate Disclosure Statement by Cisco Systems, Inc.. (Padmanabhan, Krishnan) |
Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Cisco Systems, Inc..(Padmanabhan, Krishnan) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Krishnan Padmanabhan on behalf of Cisco Systems, Inc.. Attorney Krishnan Padmanabhan added to party Cisco Systems, Inc.(pty:dft) (Padmanabhan, Krishnan) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Christopher Thomas Gresalfi on behalf of Cisco Systems, Inc.. Attorney Christopher Thomas Gresalfi added to party Cisco Systems, Inc.(pty:dft) (Gresalfi, Christopher) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Cisco Systems, Inc.. (lad) |
Case assigned to Judge David A. Ezra. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (lad) |
Filing 5 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 forwarded to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Sensor360 LLC. (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
Filing 3 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Sensor360 LLC. (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Isaac Rabicoff on behalf of Sensor360 LLC (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXWDC-18133630), filed by Sensor360 LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Rabicoff, Isaac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Sensor360 LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Sensor360 LLC | |
Represented By: | Isaac Rabicoff |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Cisco Systems, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Krishnan Padmanabhan |
Represented By: | Christopher Thomas Gresalfi |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.