Redwood Technologies, LLC v. Leedarson IoT Technology Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Redwood Technologies, LLC
Defendant: Leedarson IoT Technology Inc. and Leedarson Lighting Co. Ltd.
Case Number: 6:2023cv00879
Filed: December 22, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Alan D Albright
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 16, 2024 Filing 15 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Leedarson Lighting Co. Ltd., Leedarson IoT Technology Inc. as to All Parties. (Neilson, Russell)
February 16, 2024 Filing 14 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Russell Hale Neilson on behalf of Leedarson IoT Technology Inc., Leedarson Lighting Co. Ltd.. Attorney Russell Hale Neilson added to party Leedarson IoT Technology Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Russell Hale Neilson added to party Leedarson Lighting Co. Ltd.(pty:dft) (Neilson, Russell)
January 23, 2024 Parties shall comply with Judge Albright's updated #Standing Order Governing Proceedings - Patent Cases available by clicking the hyperlink. (bot1)
January 16, 2024 Filing 13 NOTICE of Unopposed Extension of Time to Move, Answer, or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Original Complaint by Redwood Technologies, LLC re #1 Complaint (Conroy, Patrick)
January 16, 2024 Filing 12 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Redwood Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Conroy, Patrick)
January 16, 2024 DEFICIENCY NOTICE: re #12 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint . Pursuant to Standing Order in Patent Cases, agreed extensions that do not change hearing/trial dates must be filed in the form of a Notice. Instant Motion has been terminated and no order will issue. Please refile in form of a Notice. Thank you. (zv)
January 16, 2024 Reset Deadlines: Leedarson IoT Technology Inc. and Leedarson Lighting Co. Ltd. answer due 2/26/2024. (zv)
January 8, 2024 Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Redwood Technologies, LLC. Leedarson Lighting Co. Ltd. served on 1/4/2024, answer due 1/25/2024. (Conroy, Patrick)
January 8, 2024 Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Redwood Technologies, LLC. Leedarson IoT Technology Inc. served on 1/4/2024, answer due 1/25/2024. (Conroy, Patrick)
December 29, 2023 Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jonathan H. Rastegar on behalf of Redwood Technologies, LLC (Rastegar, Jonathan)
December 27, 2023 Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Leedarson IoT Technology Inc., Leedarson Lighting Co. Ltd.. (slm)
December 27, 2023 Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by T. William Kennedy, Jr on behalf of Redwood Technologies, LLC. Attorney T. William Kennedy, Jr added to party Redwood Technologies, LLC(pty:pla) (Kennedy, T.)
December 27, 2023 Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by John Paul Murphy on behalf of Redwood Technologies, LLC. Attorney John Paul Murphy added to party Redwood Technologies, LLC(pty:pla) (Murphy, John)
December 27, 2023 Remark All parties shall flatten all documents before e-filing and shall comply with the Standing Orders located at https://www.txwd.uscourts.gov/judges-information/standing-orders/. (slm)
December 22, 2023 Case Directly assigned to Judge Alan D Albright. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (slm)
December 22, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE of Related Cases by Redwood Technologies, LLC (Conroy, Patrick)
December 22, 2023 Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Redwood Technologies, LLC. (Conroy, Patrick)
December 22, 2023 Filing 3 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Redwood Technologies, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Dominion Harbor Enterprises, LLC, Corporate Parent Monument IP Fund 2, LLC for Redwood Technologies, LLC. (Conroy, Patrick)
December 22, 2023 Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 forwarded to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Conroy, Patrick)
December 22, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXWDC-18241345), filed by Redwood Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Conroy, Patrick)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Redwood Technologies, LLC v. Leedarson IoT Technology Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Redwood Technologies, LLC
Represented By: Patrick J. Conroy
Represented By: John Paul Murphy
Represented By: Jonathan H. Rastegar
Represented By: T. William Kennedy, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Leedarson IoT Technology Inc.
Represented By: Russell Hale Neilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Leedarson Lighting Co. Ltd.
Represented By: Russell Hale Neilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?