Prytime Medical Devices, Inc. v. Front Line Medical Technologies, Inc.
Prytime Medical Devices, Inc. |
Front Line Medical Technologies, Inc. |
6:2024cv00001 |
January 2, 2024 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Robert Pitman |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 Pro Hac Vice Letter as to Bob Gilbertson. (ad3) |
Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Prytime Medical Devices, Inc. as to Front Line Medical Technologies, Inc.. Waiver sent on 1/29/2024, answer due 4/29/2024. (Ainsworth, Charles) |
Filing 8 ORDER GRANTING #7 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney John D. Simmons for Prytime Medical Devices, Inc.. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Registration is managed by the PACER Service Center. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (ad3) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Charles L. Ainsworth on behalf of John D. Simmons ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number ATXWDC-18261139) by on behalf of Prytime Medical Devices, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Ainsworth, Charles) |
Filing 6 Pro Hac Vice Letter sent to John D. Simmons, Prytime Medical Devices, Inc. (cav) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Front Line Medical Technologies, Inc.. (cav) |
All parties shall flatten all documents before e-filing and shall comply with the Standing Orders located at https://www.txwd.uscourts.gov/judges-information/standing-orders/ (cav) |
Case Randomly assigned to Judge Robert Pitman. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (cav) |
Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Prytime Medical Devices, Inc.. (Ainsworth, Charles) |
Filing 3 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Prytime Medical Devices, Inc.. (Ainsworth, Charles) |
Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 forwarded to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Ainsworth, Charles) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXWDC-18254371), filed by Prytime Medical Devices, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C)(Ainsworth, Charles) (Attachment 1 replaced on 1/3/2024) (cav). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Prytime Medical Devices, Inc. v. Front Line Medical Technologies, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Prytime Medical Devices, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Charles L. Ainsworth |
Represented By: | John D. Simmons |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Front Line Medical Technologies, Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.