Jones v. Mundkowsky et al
| Jabias D. Jones |
| Judge Nikki Mundkowsky, Amber Martinez and Charles Levy |
| 6:2024cv00005 |
| January 2, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Alan D Albright |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 MOTION to Quash by Charles Levy. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order on Charles Levy Motion to Quash)(White, Steven) |
| Filing 20 RESPONSE to #17 MOTION to Stay Discovery MOTION for Protective Order from Discovery by Jabias D. Jones. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(lad) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/1/2024: #2 Exhibit B-J sealed due to minor childrens' info) (lad). |
| Filing 19 NOTICE of Filing Proof of Service of Subpoenas by Jabias D. Jones (lad) |
| Filing 18 Sur-reply to Motion, filed by Jabias D. Jones, re #5 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Defendant Nikki Mundkowsky (lad) |
| Filing 17 MOTION to Stay Discovery, MOTION for Confidentiality/Protective Order from Discovery by Amber Martinez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit D-1, #2 Proposed Order)(Dixon, Michael) |
| Filing 16 RESPONSE in Support, filed by Amber Martinez, re #7 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Defendant Amber Martinez (Dixon, Michael) |
| Filing 15 REPLY to Response to Motion, filed by Nikki Mundkowsky, re #5 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Defendant Nikki Mundkowsky (Graydon, Scot) |
| Filing 14 Response in Opposition to Motion, filed by Jabias D. Jones, re #6 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Defendant Charles Levy. (lad) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/21/2024: #1 Sealed Exhibits - sealed due to minor childrens' names) (lad). |
| Filing 13 Response in Opposition to Motion, filed by Jabias D. Jones, re #7 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Defendant Amber Martinez (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(lad) |
| Filing 12 SUPPLEMENT : Exhibit A to #10 Response in Opposition to Motion by Jabias D. Jones. (lad) |
| Filing 11 Redacted Copy of #6 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim , #8 CORRECTED Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Redacted by Charles Levy. (White, Steven) |
| Filing 10 Response in Opposition to Motion, filed by Jabias D. Jones, re #5 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Defendant Nikki Mundkowsky (lad) |
| Filing 9 DEFICIENCY NOTICE: re #8 CORRECTED Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Redacted (lad) |
| Filing 8 CORRECTED Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Redacted by Charles Levy. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(White, Steven) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss by Amber Martinez. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Dixon, Michael) |
| Notice to filing attorney: Document #6 has been sealed by the Clerk's Office because the full names of minor children were included. Please file a redacted copy using the "redacted copy" event. (lad) |
| Filing 6 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Charles Levy. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order On Motion to Dismiss by Charles Levy)(White, Steven) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss by Nikki Mundkowsky. (Graydon, Scot) |
| Filing 4 Civil filing & Copies fee received in the amount of $406, receipt number 1103 (cav) |
| Filing 3 Case Opening Letter. (lad) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Charles Levy, Amber Martinez, Nikki Mundkowsky. (lad) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT, filed by Jabias D. Jones. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(lad) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
