Ellis-Erkkila v. Manske et al
| Priscilla A. Ellis-Erkkila |
| Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Manske, Magistrate Judge FNU Gilliland, Administrative Courts Counsel, Merrick Garland, JUDICIAL HOUSE & MEANS COMMITTEE, UNITED STATES SENATE JUDICIAL COMMITTEE, UNITED STATES U.S. Marshals and UNITED STATES FBI (Federal Bureau of Investigations) |
| 6:2024cv00014 |
| January 8, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Alan D Albright |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Text Order DISMISSING #6 Motion to Reopen Case entered by Judge Alan D Albright. The case was already reopened once the filing fee was received. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (tb)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION to Reopen Case by Priscilla A. Ellis-Erkkila. (lad) |
| Filing 5 Filing fee received in the amount of $405, receipt number 1135 (lad) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER REOPENING CASE and vacating #3 Order of Dismissal. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (lad)
|
|
Filing 3
***VACATED by #4 *** ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (lad) Modified on 1/25/2024 (lad).
|
| Filing 2 Case Opening Letter. (lad) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT, filed by Priscilla A. Ellis-Erkkila. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(lad) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
