Kirby, II v. Bishop Lifting Products, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Joseph Kirby, II and Josephy Kirby, II
Defendant: Bishop Lifting Products, Inc., BEM Business Management LLC, CMM Business Management, Inc. and Matex Acquisition Corporation
Case Number: 7:2018cv00181
Filed: October 11, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Presiding Judge: David Counts
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 27, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 14 Order for Scheduling Recommendations/Proposed Scheduling Order. Parties shall submit a scheduling recommendations/proposed scheduling order to the Court within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. Signed by Judge David Counts. (se)
November 26, 2018 Filing 13 CMM Business Management, Inc. f/k/a Matex Wire Rope Co., Inc.'s ANSWER to #1 Complaint, . Attorney Clayton R. Hearn added to party CMM Business Management, Inc.(pty:dft) by CMM Business Management, Inc..(Hearn, Clayton)
November 26, 2018 Filing 12 BEM Business Management, LLC f/k/a M-Cable LLC and d/b/a WRC, LLC's ANSWER to #1 Complaint, . Attorney Clayton R. Hearn added to party BEM Business Management LLC(pty:dft) by BEM Business Management LLC.(Hearn, Clayton)
November 26, 2018 Filing 11 Matex Acquisition Corporation d/b/a WRC and Matex Wire Rope Co.'s ANSWER to #1 Complaint, . Attorney Clayton R. Hearn added to party Matex Acquisition Corporation(pty:dft) by Matex Acquisition Corporation.(Hearn, Clayton)
November 26, 2018 Filing 10 Bishop Lifting Products, Inc.'s ANSWER to #1 Complaint, . Attorney Clayton R. Hearn added to party Bishop Lifting Products, Inc.(pty:dft) by Bishop Lifting Products, Inc..(Hearn, Clayton)
October 22, 2018 Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Josephy Kirby, II. CMM Business Management, Inc. served on 10/15/2018, answer due 11/5/2018. (Verrett, Daniel)
October 17, 2018 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Josephy Kirby, II. Matex Acquisition Corporation served on 10/16/2018, answer due 11/6/2018. (Verrett, Daniel)
October 15, 2018 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Josephy Kirby, II. Bishop Lifting Products, Inc. served on 10/12/2018, answer due 11/2/2018. (Verrett, Daniel)
October 12, 2018 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to CMM Business Management, Inc. (lw)
October 12, 2018 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to BEM Business Management LLC. (lw)
October 12, 2018 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Matex Acquisition Corporation. (lw)
October 12, 2018 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Bishop Lifting Products, Inc. (lw)
October 11, 2018 Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Joseph Kirby, II. (All Defendants) (Verrett, Daniel)
October 11, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0542-11327322), filed by Joseph Kirby, II. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Notice of Consent, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Verrett, Daniel) (Attachment 2 replaced on 10/11/2018) (lw). (Attachment 2 replaced on 10/11/2018) (lw).
October 11, 2018 Case assigned to Judge David Counts. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (lw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kirby, II v. Bishop Lifting Products, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bishop Lifting Products, Inc.
Represented By: Clayton R. Hearn
Represented By: Mia Breaux Lorick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BEM Business Management LLC
Represented By: Clayton R. Hearn
Represented By: Mia Breaux Lorick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CMM Business Management, Inc.
Represented By: Clayton R. Hearn
Represented By: Mia Breaux Lorick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Matex Acquisition Corporation
Represented By: Clayton R. Hearn
Represented By: Mia Breaux Lorick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joseph Kirby, II
Represented By: Daniel Anthony Verrett
Represented By: Edmond S Moreland, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Josephy Kirby, II
Represented By: Daniel Anthony Verrett
Represented By: Edmond S Moreland, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?