Prescott et al v. Butch's Rat Hole & Anchor Service, Inc.
James Prescott, Raymond Turner, Jimmy Prescott, Mike Ciuba and Justin Piaz |
Butch's Rat Hole & Anchor Service, Inc. |
7:2019cv00009 |
January 11, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
David Counts |
Ronald C Griffin |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 SCHEDULING ORDER: Bench Trial set for 7/6/2020 08:00 AM before Judge David Counts, Pretrial Conference set for 6/11/2020 01:30 PM before Judge David Counts, ADR Report Deadline due by 5/8/2019, Amended Pleadings due by 6/8/2019, Discovery due by 9/16/2019, Joinder of Parties due by 6/8/2019, Dispositive Motions due by 10/28/2019. Signed by Judge David Counts. (se) |
Filing 11 Scheduling Recommendations (Joint) by Mike Ciuba, Justin Piaz, James Prescott, Jimmy Prescott, Raymond Turner. (Borsellino, Joshua) |
Filing 10 ANSWER to #8 Amended Complaint by Butch's Rat Hole & Anchor Service, Inc..(Lamont, Charlotte) |
Filing 9 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Ronald C. Griffin. Signed by Judge David Counts. (se) |
Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT (First) against Butch's Rat Hole & Anchor Service, Inc. amending, filed by James Prescott, Raymond Turner, Jimmy Prescott, Justin Piaz, Mike Ciuba.(Borsellino, Joshua) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Kerry E. Notestine for Charlotte Lamont ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-11757856) by on behalf of Butch's Rat Hole & Anchor Service, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Notestine, Kerry) Modified on 2/13/2019 to include name of attorney (se). |
It is ORDERED Charlotte Lamont's Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice, doc. #7 filed February 13, 2019, is GRANTED. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice Pro Hac Vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our Court within 10 days of this Order. It is further ORDERED that if Ms. Lamont has not already done so, shall immediately tender the amount of $100.00, made payable to: Clerk, U.S. District Court, in compliance with Local Court Rule AT-1(f)(2). Entered by Judge David Counts. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (db) |
Filing 6 Order for Scheduling Recommendations/Proposed Scheduling Order. Scheduling recommendations/proposed scheduling order due to the Court within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. Signed by Judge David Counts. (se) |
Filing 5 Pro Hac Vice Letter to Attorney Charlotte Lamont as to Butch's Rat Hole & Anchor Service, Inc. (se) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to #1 Complaint . Attorney Kerry E. Notestine added to party Butch's Rat Hole & Anchor Service, Inc.(pty:dft) by Butch's Rat Hole & Anchor Service, Inc..(Notestine, Kerry) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Butch's Rat Hole & Anchor Service, Inc. (lw) |
Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by James Prescott, Raymond Turner. (Borsellino, Joshua) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0542-11634272), filed by James Prescott, Raymond Turner. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Borsellino, Joshua) |
Case assigned to Judge David Counts. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (lw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.