Gilbert v. Nodolf et al
| Reginald Christopher Gilbert |
| FNU Ward, FNU Holtz, The State of Texas, Midland Police Department, Roy Scott, FNU Chairez and Laura Nodolf |
| 7:2019cv00130 |
| May 29, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| David Counts |
| Ronald C Griffin |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 FINAL JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge David Counts. (dm2) |
Filing 13
ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. Signed by Judge David Counts. (dm2)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE as to Reginald Christopher Gilbert.. Signed by Judge David Counts. (dm2)
|
| Filing 6 Certified & Regular Mail Receipt of #5 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, #4 Order for More Definite Statement (dt) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER DENYING #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Signed by Judge David Counts. (dt)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT Statement due July 1, 2019. Signed by Judge David Counts. (dt)
|
| Filing 3 Case Opening Letter to Reginald Christopher Gilbert. (lw) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Reginald Christopher Gilbert.. Motions referred to Judge Ronald C. Griffin. (lw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT, filed by Reginald Christopher Gilbert.(lw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
