Newsome, Jr. v. QES Pressure Control, LLC
| John Newsome, Jr. |
| QES Pressure Control, LLC |
| 7:2019cv00150 |
| June 24, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| David Counts |
| Ronald C Griffin |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
SCHEDULING ORDER: Pretrial Conference set for 11/6/2020 10:00 AM before Judge David Counts, Jury Selection set for 12/7/2020 08:00 AM before Judge David Counts, Jury Trial set for 12/7/2020 08:00 AM before Judge David Counts, ADR Report Deadline due by 10/16/2019, Amended Pleadings due by 11/15/2019, Discovery due by 6/26/2020, Joinder of Parties due by 11/15/2019, Dispositive Motions due by 7/31/2020. Signed by Judge David Counts. (se)
|
| Filing 11 Scheduling Recommendations by John Newsome, Jr.. (McEntire, Merideth) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Robert John Grubb, II on behalf of QES Pressure Control, LLC. Attorney Robert John Grubb, II added to party QES Pressure Control, LLC(pty:dft) (Grubb, Robert) |
|
Filing 9
Order for Scheduling Recommendations/Proposed Scheduling Order. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall submit a proposed scheduling order to the Court within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. Signed by Judge David Counts. (dm2)
|
| Filing 8 Pro Hac Vice Letter mailed to R. John Grubb II. (dm2) |
| Filing 7 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by QES Pressure Control, LLC. (Muskat, Michael) |
| Filing 6 Defendant's ANSWER to #1 Complaint . Attorney Michael J. Muskat added to party QES Pressure Control, LLC(pty:dft) by QES Pressure Control, LLC.(Muskat, Michael) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Ronald C. Griffin. Signed by Judge David Counts. (dm2)
|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to QES Pressure Control, LLC. (dm2) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE Consent to Join Collective Action by John Newsome, Jr. (Sanford, Josh) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by John Newsome, Jr.. (Sanford, Josh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0542-12267405), filed by John Newsome, Jr.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sanford, Josh) |
| Case assigned to Judge David Counts. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (dm2) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Newsome, Jr. v. QES Pressure Control, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: John Newsome, Jr. | |
| Represented By: | Josh Sanford |
| Represented By: | Merideth Q. McEntire |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: QES Pressure Control, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Robert John Grubb, II |
| Represented By: | Michael J. Muskat |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
