Martin v. SDS Staffing, LLC
| Tina Martin |
| SDS Staffing, LLC |
| 7:2019cv00198 |
| August 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| David Counts |
| Ronald C Griffin |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 ORIGINAL ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by SDS Staffing, LLC.(Williams, G.) |
| Filing 7 Opposed MOTION to Transfer Case or Dismiss by SDS Staffing, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. "A" - Affidavit of Becky Latta). Motions referred to Judge Ronald C. Griffin. (Williams, G.) |
It is ORDERED G. Scott Williams' Motion for Appearance Pro Hac Vice, Doc. #6 filed September 16, 2019, is GRANTED. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice Pro Hac Vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our Court within 10 days of this Oder. It is further ORDERED that if Mr. Williams has not already done so, shall immediately tender the amount of $100.00, made payable to: Clerk, U.S. District Court, in compliance with Local Court Rule AT-1(f(2). Entered by Judge David Counts. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (db)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Robert Joseph Killeen, Jr Pro Hac Vice of G. Scott Williams ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-12613387) by on behalf of SDS Staffing, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order). Motions referred to Judge Ronald C. Griffin. (Killeen, Robert) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Tina Martin. SDS Staffing, LLC served on 8/26/2019, answer due 9/16/2019. (Moreland, Edmond) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Ronald C. Griffin. Signed by Judge David Counts. (se)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to SDS Staffing, LLC. (ja) |
| Case assigned to Judge David Counts. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (ja) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Tina Martin. (Parmet, Matthew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0542-12500190), filed by Tina Martin. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Consent to Join, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Parmet, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Martin v. SDS Staffing, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: SDS Staffing, LLC | |
| Represented By: | G. Scott Williams |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tina Martin | |
| Represented By: | Matthew Scott Parmet |
| Represented By: | Edmond S Moreland, Jr |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
