Gonzales et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Correctional Officer Ruben Gonzales, Wanda Gonzales and Ruben Gonzales |
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |
7:2019cv00278 |
November 27, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
David Counts |
Real Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 5 Scheduling Recommendations Agreed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Anthony, Arthur) |
|
Filing 3 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Anthony, Arthur) |
Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Parties by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Anthony, Arthur) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0542-12901824), filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit B - Supplemental Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit C - State Court Docket Sheet, #4 Exhibit C-1- Plaintiff's Original Petition and Request for Disclosures, #5 Exhibit C-2 - Defendant's Original Answer to Plaintiffs' Original Petition and Request for Disclosures, #6 Exhibit D - Midland County Central Appraisal District Valuation)(Anthony, Arthur) |
Case assigned to Judge David Counts. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (slt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.