Oppong v. Home Depot U.S.A. Inc.
| Kwame Oppong |
| Home Depot U.S.A. Inc. |
| 7:2021cv00005 |
| January 14, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| David Counts |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
SCHEDULING ORDER: Final Pretrial Conference set for 5/13/2022 01:30 PM in Midland before Judge David Counts, Jury Selection/Trial set for 6/6/2022 08:00 AM in Midland before Judge David Counts. Signed by Judge David Counts. (se)
|
| Filing 7 Scheduling Recommendations by Home Depot U.S.A. Inc.. (Harrison, Katherine) |
|
Filing 6
Order for Scheduling Recommendations/Proposed Scheduling Order. Scheduling recommendations/proposed scheduling order due to the Court within thirty (30) days after the appearance of any defendant. Signed by Judge David Counts. (slt)
|
| Filing 5 Defendants' ANSWER to #4 Amended Complaint by Home Depot U.S.A. Inc..(Harrison, Katherine) |
| Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Home Depot U.S.A. Inc. amending, filed by Kwame Oppong.(se) |
|
Text Order GRANTING #3 Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint. The Clerk is directed to file the Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint attached to this Motion. Entered by Judge David Counts. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (db)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION to Amend Complaint by Kwame Oppong. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Cevallos, Mark) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER TO AMEND PLEADINGS. Signed by Judge David Counts. (se)
|
| Case assigned to Judge David Counts. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (se) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Home Depot U.S.A. Inc. (Filing fee $402 receipt number 0542-14375330), filed by Home Depot U.S.A. Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A Index, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A-1 Docket Sheet, #3 Exhibit Exhibit A-2 Original petition, #4 Exhibit Exhibit A-3 Citation, #5 Exhibit Exhibit A-4 Citation, #6 Exhibit Exhibit A-5 Answer, #7 Exhibit Ex. A- 6 Notice of Filing Notice of Removal, #8 Exhibit EX. B RESP TO RFA, #9 Exhibit Ex. C Defendant's Disclosure Statement, #10 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Farrar, Chad) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Oppong v. Home Depot U.S.A. Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kwame Oppong | |
| Represented By: | Mark A. Cevallos |
| Represented By: | Matthew J. Olivarez |
| Represented By: | Kevin B. Miller |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Home Depot U.S.A. Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Chad Lane Farrar |
| Represented By: | Katherine P. Harrison |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
