Kendall v. Garza et al
| Tracy Lee Kendall |
| Senior Warden Kimberly L. Garza and Assistant Warden R. Almanza |
| Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin |
| 7:2021cv00205 |
| November 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| David Counts |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Case transferred from TXWD has been received and opened in Western District of Texas - Pecos Division Division as case number 4:21-CV-00081. (sg) |
Filing 5
FINAL ORDER OF TRANSFER re #4 Order transferring this cause to the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, Pecos Division. Signed by Judge David Counts. (sg)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER TRANSFERRING CAUSE TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS, PECOS DIVISION. Signed by Judge David Counts. (sg)
|
| Filing 3 Case Opening Letter by Tracy Lee Kendall. (kg) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Tracy Lee Kendall. (kg) |
| Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 700017307), filed by Tracy Lee Kendall.(kg) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/3/2021: #1 Attachment A, #2 Attachment B, #3 Memo in Support, #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit) (kg). (Main Document 1 replaced on 11/3/2021) (kg). Modified on 11/3/2021 (kg). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
