Abernathy v. Ector County Detention Center et al
| Daniel Wayne Abernathy |
| Ector County Detention Center, CO FNU Escamilla, CO FNU Barrows, CO FNU Hallowell and Corporal FNU Thoombs |
| 7:2021cv00221 |
| November 10, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| David Counts |
| Ronald C Griffin |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
SECOND AND FINAL ORDER FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT Statement due 1/31/2022. Signed by Judge David Counts. (jb3)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER DISMISSING CASE AGAINST DEFENDANT ECTOR COUNTY DETENTION CENTER. Signed by Judge David Counts. (jb3)
|
| Filing 6 RESPONSE to #5 Order for More Definite Statement by Daniel Wayne Abernathy. (jb3) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT. Statement due 12/22/2021. Signed by Judge David Counts. (jb3)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of Daniel Wayne Abernathy. Signed by Judge David Counts. (jb3)
|
| Filing 3 Case Opening Letter as to Daniel Wayne Abernathy. (sg) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Daniel Wayne Abernathy.. Motions referred to Judge Ronald C. Griffin. (sg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (Filing fee $ 402.00-IFP Pending), filed by Daniel Wayne Abernathy.(sg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
