Hammer et al v. Safeco Insurance Company of Indiana
Allen Hammer and Shelby Hammer |
Safeco Insurance Company of Indiana |
7:2021cv00249 |
December 29, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
David Counts |
Ronald C Griffin |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Petition for Removal-Breach of Contract |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Ronald C. Griffin pursuant to the Standing Order on Case Management found at #Standing Order . (sg) |
Case assigned to Judge David Counts. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (sg) |
Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Parties by Safeco Insurance Company of Indiana. (Tillman, Mark) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Safeco Insurance Company of Indiana (Filing fee $402 receipt number 0542-15570221), filed by Safeco Insurance Company of Indiana. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Index of All documents filed in State Court, #2 Exhibit B-Pf Demand Letter, #3 Exhibit C-Plaintiffs' Original Petition and Citation, #4 Exhibit C-1-Citation Issued to Safeco, #5 Exhibit C-2-Officer's Return, #6 Exhibit C-S-Safeco's Answer to Plaintiffs' Original Petition, #7 Civil Cover Sheet, #8 Supplement Civil Case Cover Shett)(Tillman, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.