Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Snyder et al
Plaintiff: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Defendant: William Snyder and Shirley Snyder
Case Number: 7:2023cv00107
Filed: July 11, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Presiding Judge: David Counts
Referring Judge: Ronald C Griffin
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: Arbitration
Cause of Action: 09 U.S.C. ยง 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 8, 2023 Filing 4 REPLY to Response to Motion, filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., re #1 MOTION to Compel filed by Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Daniel Durell, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F)(Durell, Daniel)
August 1, 2023 Filing 3 Respondents William Snyder and Shirley Snyder's ANSWER to #1 Complaint, Response in Opposition to Wells Fargo's Application to Confirm Arbitral Award and Response in Opposition to Motion to Compel Arbitration. Attorney Ernest W. Boyd, Jr added to party Shirley Snyder(pty:dft), Attorney Ernest W. Boyd, Jr added to party William Snyder(pty:dft) by Shirley Snyder, William Snyder. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16, #17 Exhibit 17, #18 Exhibit 18, #19 Proposed Order Denying Application to Confirm Arbitral Award and Motion to Compel Arbitration)(Boyd, Ernest)
July 12, 2023 Filing 2 Pro Hac Vice Letter to Shirley Snyder, William Snyder as to Butch Boyd and Jilian Scherrer. (kg)
July 11, 2023 Case assigned to Judge David Counts and Judge Ronald C. Griffin. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (kg)
July 11, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Application to Confirm Arbitral Award and, in the alternative, Motion to Compel Arbitration ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXWDC-17641423). No Summons requested at this time, filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit /Declaration of Daniel Durell, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Proposed Order, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(Durell, Daniel) Modified on 8/8/2023 (kg).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Snyder et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Represented By: Daniel Durell
Represented By: Benjamin David Lee Foster
Represented By: Robert T. Mowrey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William Snyder
Represented By: Ernest W. Boyd, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Shirley Snyder
Represented By: Ernest W. Boyd, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?