Sanchez v. I.Q. Data International, Inc.
Thomas Sanchez |
I.Q. Data International, Inc. |
7:2023cv00140 |
September 5, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
David Counts |
Ronald C Griffin |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) by I.Q. Data International, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Proposed Order)(Staley, Lee) |
Text Order MOOTING #7 Motion to Dismiss. The instant motion is rendered MOOT by the Plaintiff's filing of his Amended Complaint. (Doc. 10). It is so ORDERED. Entered by Judge Ronald C. Griffin. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (TGlc) |
Filing 10 AMENDED COMPLAINT against I.Q. Data International, Inc. amending, filed by Thomas Sanchez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Jaffer, Shawn) |
Filing 9 Proposed Order Amended Order Granting Defendant I.Q. Data International, Inc.'s to #7 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) by I.Q. Data International, Inc.. (Staley, Lee) |
Filing 8 ORDER AND ADVISORY. Signed by Judge David Counts. (slt) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) by I.Q. Data International, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Staley, Lee) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Thomas Sanchez. I.Q. Data International, Inc. served on 9/11/2023, answer due 10/2/2023. (Jaffer, Shawn) |
Filing 5 Certificate of Interested Parties Amended by Thomas Sanchez. (Jaffer, Shawn) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to I.Q. Data International, Inc. (slt) |
Case assigned to Judge David Counts and Judge Ronald C. Griffin. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (slt) |
DEFICIENCY NOTICE: re #2 Certificate of Interested Parties. No signature block contained in pleading. Local Rule CV-10(b) requires signature block to include mailing address, e-mail address, signature, state bar card number, and telephone and fax numbers, including area code. (slt) |
Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Thomas Sanchez. (Jaffer, Shawn) |
Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Parties by Thomas Sanchez. (Jaffer, Shawn) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXWDC-17845605), filed by Thomas Sanchez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit)(Jaffer, Shawn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Sanchez v. I.Q. Data International, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Thomas Sanchez | |
Represented By: | Shawn Jaffer |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: I.Q. Data International, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Ben E. Hamel |
Represented By: | Lee H. Staley |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.