Hawkins v. FCA US LLC
Sarah & Brady Hawkins |
FCA US LLC |
7:2023cv00194 |
December 6, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
David Counts |
Ronald C Griffin |
Contract: Other |
15 U.S.C. ยง 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER and ADVISORY. Signed by Judge David Counts. (je3) |
Filing 8 Order for Scheduling Recommendations/Proposed Scheduling Order. Scheduling recommendations/proposed scheduling order due to the Court within thirty (30) days after the appearance of any defendant. Signed by Judge David Counts. (je3) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint . Attorney Matthew R. Beatty added to party FCA US LLC(pty:dft) by FCA US LLC.(Beatty, Matthew) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: FCA US LLC answer due 1/15/2024. (kg) |
Text Order GRANTING #6 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiffs' Original Complaint. It is ORDERED that Defendant FCA US LLC's deadline to answer Plaintiffs' Original Complaint shall be January 15, 2024. It is so ORDERED. Entered by Judge Ronald C. Griffin. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (db) |
Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by FCA US LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order). Motions referred to Judge Ronald C. Griffin. (Beatty, Matthew) |
DEFICIENCY NOTICE: re #6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer Incorrect header. Please include Midland/Odessa Division. Please do not refile the Motion. Use the "ATTACHMENT" event from the menu and attach the correct Motion as the "Main Document". In the docket text, type "Amended Motion". |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sarah & Brady Hawkins. FCA US LLC served on 12/7/2023, answer due 12/28/2023. (Kimmel, Craig) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to FCA US LLC. (je3) |
Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Sarah & Brady Hawkins. (Kimmel, Craig) |
Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Parties by Sarah & Brady Hawkins. (Kimmel, Craig) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXWDC-18172684), filed by Sarah & Brady Hawkins. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kimmel, Craig) |
Case assigned to Judge David Counts and Judge Ronald C. Griffin. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (je3) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Hawkins v. FCA US LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Sarah & Brady Hawkins | |
Represented By: | Craig Thor Kimmel |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: FCA US LLC | |
Represented By: | Matthew R. Beatty |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.