Lozano v. Licon et al
| Thomas B. Lozano |
| Correctional Officer FNU Licon, Police Officer FNU Studder/Potter and Ector County Detention Center Administrators and Staff |
| 7:2024cv00035 |
| February 1, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| David Counts |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 RESPONSE to #5 Order for More Definite Statement by Thomas B. Lozano. (je3) |
| Filing 7 RESPONSE to #5 Order for More Definite Statement by Thomas B. Lozano. (je3) |
Text Order GRANTING DOC. #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to the Court's prior Order, up to and including Friday, March 29, 2024, entered by Judge David Counts. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (tlm)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File by Thomas B. Lozano. (je3) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT Statement due February 29, 2024. Signed by Judge David Counts. (je3)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of Thomas B. Lozano. Signed by Judge David Counts. (je3)
|
| Filing 3 Case Opening Letter by Thomas B. Lozano. (kg) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Thomas B. Lozano. (kg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (Filing fee $ 405 IFP Pending.), filed by Thomas B. Lozano.(kg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
