Eisenhour v. Weber County et al
Plaintiff: Marcia Eisenhour
Defendant: Weber County and Craig D. Storey
Case Number: 1:2010cv00022
Filed: February 16, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Office: Northern Office
County: Weber
Presiding Judge: Dee Benson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Sex Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 2, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 491 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER AWARDING WEBER COUNTY DEFENDANTS COSTS-For the reasons stated in the Order: Weber County Defendants' Bill of Costs 439 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part and Weber County is awarded costs in the amount of $8,649.96. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 6/1/17. (jmr)
April 26, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 488 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER-granting in part and denying in part 441 Motion for Attorney Fees and Plaintiff is awarded $238,225.50 as attorney fees. Plaintiff's Bill of Costs (Dkt. No. 325) and Notice of Renewal of Bill of Costs (Dkt. No. 440) are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part and Plaintiff is awarded costs in the amount of $4,207.53. See Order for further details. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 4/26/17. (jmr)
October 6, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 380 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER-denying 373 Motion to Disqualify Judge. See Order for details. Signed by Judge David Sam on 10/6/16. (jmr)
July 1, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 369 MEMORANDUM DECISION and Order-denying 326 Motion for Attorney Fees; granting in part and denying in part 335 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law ; granting in part and denying in part 335 Motion for New Trial; denying [311 ] Motion ; granting in part and denying in part 316 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law ; granting in part and denying in part 316 Motion for New Trial; granting in part and denying in part 316 Motion to Alter Judgment. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 7/1/16. (jmr)
March 20, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 295 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying renewed 289 Motion to Compel Discovery. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 3/20/15 (alt)
October 10, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 146 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 78 Motion for Summary Judgment ; granting 80 Motion for Summary Judgment ; finding as moot 82 Motion to Exclude; denying 84 Motion for Summary Judgment ; granting 120 Motion to Exclude; denying 122 Motion to Exclude. Signed by Judge Dee Benson on 10/10/12. (jlw)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Eisenhour v. Weber County et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marcia Eisenhour
Represented By: Brenda J. Beaton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Weber County
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Craig D. Storey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?