Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00164
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lopez v. Davis County Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2026cv00149
Plaintiff:
Jerry Ernest Lopez
Defendant:
Davis County Correctional Facility, Weber County Correctional Facility and Clearfield City Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Newman v. Ogden City et al
as 1:2026cv00139
Plaintiff:
Dawn Marie Newman
Defendant:
Ogden City, Alexa Mariah Barela, Jason Vanderwarf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States v. Geddes
as 26-4109
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DERALD WILFORD GEDDES, BLACK ROCK VENTURES, LLC, NATIONWIDE BANK and others
English v. Weber et al
as 1:2026cv00136
Plaintiff:
James Walter English
Defendant:
Ryan Arbon, Weber County, Benard Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fastre et al v. Weber County et al
as 2:2026cv00381
Plaintiff:
Finn Fastre and Jason Fastre
Defendant:
Weber County, Ashley Wilson, Ashlyn McGlone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fastre et al v. Weber County et al
as 1:2026cv00060
Plaintiff:
Finn Fastre and Jason Fastre
Defendant:
Weber County, Ashley Wilson, Ashlyn McGlone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hill v. Weber County Second District Court et al
as 1:2026cv00048
Plaintiff:
Joshua James Hill
Defendant:
Weber County Second District Court and Estate of Chih Hao Wang
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
US v. Geddes
as 25-2044
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
DERALD W. GEDDES, BLACK ROCK VENTURES, NATIONWIDE BANK and others
United States v. Geddes, et al
as 25-4108
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DERALD WILFORD GEDDES, BLACK ROCK VENTURES, LLC, NATIONWIDE BANK and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
