Hogan v. Utah Telecommunications Open Infrastructure Agency et al
Chris Hogan |
Utah Telecommunications Open Infrastructure Agency and Todd Marriott |
1:2011cv00064 |
April 25, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of Utah |
Northern Office |
Davis |
Ted Stewart |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 123 MEMORANDUM DECISION denying 116 Motion for Order to Show Cause. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 10/03/2013. (asp) |
Filing 103 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 88 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment and granting in part and denying in part 95 Plaintiff's Amended Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 4/15/13. (ss) |
Filing 98 MEMORANDUM DECISION denying 84 Motion to deem admitted sixth request for admission. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner on 3/1/13. (ss) |
Filing 75 MEMORANDUM DECISION denying 62 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; granting 64 Motion to Dismiss; granting 68 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 07/06/2012. (tls) |
Filing 61 MEMORANDUM DECISION denying 45 Motion to Alter Judgment ; denying 47 Motion to Stay ; granting 56 Motion for Scheduling Order. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 03/08/2012. (asp) |
Filing 41 MEMORANDUM DECISION and Ordergranting in part and denying in part 19 Motion to Dismiss; denying 27 Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 10/18/2011. (tls) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.