Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Wintrode v. Carter et al
as 1:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Joshwa Aaron Wintrode
Defendant:
Tom Carter, Chris Hogan, Randall Buffalo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Veenstra v. Hogan et al
as 1:2018cv00488
Defendant:
Givens, Sherry Stoutin, Chris Hogan and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Richard Veenstra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Veenstra v. Givens et al
as 1:2018cv00366
Defendant:
Givens, Chris Hogan, Sherry Stoutin and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Richard Veenstra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hogan v. Utah Telecom, et al
as 14-4138
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRIS HOGAN
Defendant - Appellee:
UTAH TELECOMMUNICATIONS OPEN INFRASTRUCTURE AGENCY and TODD MARRIOTT, Executive Director of Utah Telecommunication Open Infrastructure Agency
Anderson et al v. NVR, Inc.
as 6:2013cv06315
Plaintiff:
Linda Anderson , David Andrews , Heather Arrasmith and others
Defendant:
NVR, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-4073
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-4069
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hogan v. Winder, et al
as 12-4167
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRIS HOGAN, an individual
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL K. WINDER, in his official capacity as Mayor of West Valley City, Utah, and in his individual capacity, WEST VALLEY CITY, UTAH, a municipal corporation, KEVAN BARNEY and others
Hogan v. Winder et al
as 2:2012cv00123
Plaintiff:
Chris Hogan
Defendant:
Michael K. Winder , West Valley City , Kevan Barney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hogan v. Utah Telecommunications Open Infrastructure Agency et al
as 2:2011cv01111
Plaintiff:
Chris Hogan
Defendant:
Utah Telecommunications Open Infrastructure Agency and Todd Marriott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
