Walker v. Astrue

Plaintiff: Sabrina Ann Walker
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Case Number: 1:2012cv00235
Filed: November 5, 2012
Court: Utah District Court
Office: Northern Office
County: Weber
Presiding Judge: Evelyn J. Furse
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42:0405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 15, 2014 27 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 24 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Magistrate Judge Evelyn J. Furse on 8/14/14 (alt)
February 27, 2014 21 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER: the Court finds that the ALJ erred at phase two of the step-four analysis and remands the Commissioner's decision in this case for further proceedings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Evelyn J. Furse on 2/27/14 (alt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Walker v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sabrina Ann Walker
Represented By: John J. Borsos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?